Boards face a critical challenge in assessing, selecting, and developing CEO successors. The markers of readiness extend beyond traditional performance metrics into specific leadership qualities that drive organizational success. Directors must probe deeply into how a leader operates rather than merely assessing intellect and accomplishments.

At its foundation, exceptional CEO leadership centers on one fundamental capability: the ability to realize the full potential of the organization’s talent. Superior CEOs consistently elicit higher levels of commitment, drive, and performance from their teams compared to their industry peers. This differentiation manifests in measurable ways, from strong execution to elevated organizational purpose.

Strengthen Assessment Through Multiple Methods 

Understanding a candidate’s potential requires a comprehensive assessment approach that examines candidates through multiple lenses to reveal innate strengths and critical development areas. Psychometric testing reveals underlying aptitudes and personality traits that drive leadership behavior that traditional interviews often miss. Scientifically validated tools help boards understand how candidates perform under pressure, adapt to change, and engage with teams.

But testing represents only one component. In-depth career achievement interviews probe how candidates have led through challenges, while 360-degree feedback illuminates how colleagues, direct reports, and peers experience the candidate’s leadership style. Integrating these diverse data points creates a robust picture of leadership capability and potential.

For example, DHR’s Leader Lens Executive Assessment evaluates executives’ proficiency across all aspects of a role specification in order to predict future leadership performance. This approach employs four distinct methods to gather data, effectively assessing an executive’s ability to create clarity, develop people, and deliver results.

Develop With Strategic Intent 

Once identified, high-potential successors require carefully structured development. Beyond traditional executive education, the most effective programs include:

• Board exposure through special project leadership
• External board service to gain governance perspective
• Cross-functional leadership experiences
• Structured feedback and coaching aligned to specific development needs

The key is tailoring development to individual gaps and organizational direction. As strategy evolves, development priorities must change accordingly.

Recognize the Signals of Succession Readiness 

Several concrete indicators signal a candidate’s preparedness for the CEO role. First, the candidate’s development track record offers clear evidence. The keys are whether direct reports advance to significant roles, whether top performers choose to follow the leader across positions, and whether the candidate develops and promotes internal talent consistently. Boards should actively seek these verifiable patterns of talent cultivation.

Pay Attention to How Candidates Make Decisions 

The candidate’s approach to decision-making provides another important signal. The most effective leaders demonstrate the ability to extract optimal solutions from their teams rather than positioning themselves as the primary problem-solvers. Leaders who enter the CEO role believing they must personally hold all the answers often become bottlenecks to execution. In contrast, leaders who build trust in the collective intelligence of their teams – and who act on that trust – outperform consistently.

Look For Constructive Edge and Accountability

Additionally, successful CEO candidates must demonstrate appropriate performance edge – the ability to maintain high standards while engaging constructively with their teams. Some leaders underperform, not due to lack of strategy, but due to insufficient accountability. They avoid hard conversations, fail to reset expectations, or tolerate underperformance to preserve relationships.

On the other hand, leaders who have constructive edge expect the best from their teams and act when team members fail to meet those expectations. They give direct, actionable feedback. They make it clear that underperformance has consequences, while demonstrating care and commitment to the individuals. This quality allows them to uphold accountability while preserving organizational culture and engagement. Boards shouldn’t mistake this quality for abrasiveness. Rather, it’s the rare balance of empathy and rigor that enables a CEO to set a high bar and inspire others to rise to it.

---

---

Ensure Succession Success

Effective succession planning requires annual evaluation of candidates, strategic talent development, and readiness. Boards must review succession plans yearly, assessing how potential successors progress while maintaining preparedness for unexpected transitions. This regular cadence allows directors to track candidate development plans and adjust accordingly.

Successful transitions often hinge on candidates demonstrating immediate readiness. Boards should expect potential successors to present clear 90-day action plans that articulate specific strategies for advancing organizational priorities. This preparation is especially crucial for emergency succession scenarios, where boards must move swiftly yet confidently.

Managing the process requires careful attention to talent retention. Boards must maintain engagement among potential successors while avoiding potentially destructive competition. Transparent communication and appropriate retention strategies help preserve key talent throughout the evaluation period. When executed effectively, this comprehensive approach to assessing and developing CEO successors allows boards to confidently make succession decisions, ensuring leadership continuity and organizational advancement.